Get Instant Updates - Join Us On Telegram

6 thoughts on “BREAKING! President Trump — New Digital Bill of Rights – Censorship Cartel To Be Destroyed!”

  2. International Governments Are Criminalizing Free Speech Through Global Coordination; New Files Expose Plot
    In a chilling assault on free speech, governments and shadowy organizations are secretly collaborating to silence dissent and criminalize those who dare to question the official narrative.
    EXPOSED: The Secret Global Plot to Silence and Criminalize Dissent
    In a chilling assault on free speech, newly obtained documents reveal how international governments are collaborating to silence dissent and criminalize those who dare to question the official narrative. Spearheaded by the Biden-Harris administration in the U.S. and the Counter Disinformation Unit (CDU) in the UK, these revelations highlight a disturbing global effort to suppress free speech and control the flow of information.
    The new files, uncovered through America First Legal’s Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)requests, show how the U.S. and UK governments, in partnership with powerful non-governmental organizations (NGOs) like the Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH) and international bodies like NATO and the G7, have formed a global alliance to label and criminalize dissent. This global coordination is not just theoretical but has already manifested through Big Tech censorship, legal frameworks like the UK Online Safety Act 2023, and government pressure on social media platforms to deplatform individuals who challenge dominant narratives, especially those relating to health policies and vaccines.
    Please read full Article >
    https://crazzfiles.com/international-governments-are-criminalizing-free-speech-through-global-coordination-new-files-expose-plot/

    COME ON ALL AUSTRALIANS AND EVERY PERSON GLOBALLY – STAND UP NOW FOR YOUR RIGHTS TO FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND FREEDOM OF OPINION / INFORMATION = DON’T ALLOW THEM TO STRANGLE OUR VOICES ANY MORE THAN THEY HAVE DONE ALREADY – STOP THEM PERMANENTLY !

    Reply

  3. Censorship/Surveillance – Facebook Gave CDC ‘Backdoor’ Access to Help Remove Millions of Social Media Posts
    Documents obtained by America First Legal show Facebook “was operating as the de facto enforcement arm of the U.S. government’s thought control initiative,” Reclaim the Net reported.
    by Michael Nevradakis, Ph.D.
    September 30, 2024
    Facebook provided the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) “backdoor” access to its platform so the CDC could submit requests to remove COVID-19 “misinformation,” according to an internal Facebook document made public for the first time as part of an ongoing legal case.
    America First Legal filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request in 2021, after then-White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki revealed the Biden administration was flagging purported “disinformation” on social media platforms, including content posted by members of the so-called “Disinformation Dozen.”
    When the Biden administration didn’t comply with the FOIA request, America First Legal sued, leading to the release of the documents as part of the discovery process.
    According to Reclaim the Net, in 2021, Facebook developed a “Content Request System” (see pages 54-72) — also called a “Government Reporting System” — accessible to CDC staff. The documents show Facebook “was operating as the de facto enforcement arm of the US government’s thought control initiative.”
    The Facebook-CDC partnership helped Facebook remove millions of posts, the documents show.
    Gene Hamilton, executive director of America First Legal, told The Defender, “These documents show precisely how one of the social media platforms facilitated the federal government’s engagement in unconstitutional censorship activities.”
    Full story >
    https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/facebook-cdc-partnership-censor-misinformation/

    Comment > Many people and groups also had their facebook pages permanently disabled for sharing ‘the truth’ / information/opinions/speech which differed from the ” lockstep global governments’ narrative”.

    Reply

  4. Why you are not getting hardly “any truth news at all” from Mainstream Media Empires >
    “Who Owns the World?” A Small Group of Big Money
    By Peter Koenig
    Global Research, February 26, 2024
    Who Owns the World” is the title of an extraordinary documentary, describing how Big-Big Money controls not only every aspect of your life, but has a stranglehold on every government, the political UN body, as well as every UN agency, and all industries and services of this globe.
    These largest investors are BlackRock, Vanguard, and State Street.
    These same investment groups also control over 90% of the world’s major media.
    Even Rupert Murdoch’s media empire is majority owned by BlackRock / Vanguard. It is therefore no miracle that hardly any news penetrates the walls of secrecy about these major shareholders of every aspect of human life and life-related activities and businesses.
    They control politicians, geopolitics and military deployments
    It is a monopoly that can literally not be opposed by traditional means.
    They have also invented the “rules-based order” — overruling every international and national law at their will.
    They know no limits, no ethics and adhere to no human or human rights standard. POWER is them.
    https://www.globalresearch.ca/who-owns-world-small-group-big-money/5850681

    Reply

  5. Every Australian should be deeply distressed what is happening and take action >

    The Coalition will deliver a misinformation and disinformation policy prior to the election – No matter what their ‘good’ intentions are, the Coalition should not be seeking to replace Labor’s Misinformation and Disinformation Bill with another one of their own. Even if their next bill were ‘perfect’, it would set in law the ability to censor public speech and open the door to constant amendments which would, over time, create a tyrannical mechanism for government to misuse. Just. Stop.
    Posted on : 01/10/2024
    We were right to be sceptical of the Liberal Party’s denouncement of Labor’s Misinformation and Disinformation Bill.
    Having gained the first positive political traction from the Blue Ribbon base since their opposition to the Voice to Parliament, Senator Jane Hume has summarily dismantled any delusions that the Liberals have learned their lesson or committed themselves to civil liberty.
    (And if the following is a mistake, or a misspoken reply, by all means let us have the Coalition step forward and forever promise to leave this legislation in the shredder.)
    Speaking to the current bill on Sky News Australia yesterday, Senator Hume said:
    ‘The Coalition will deliver its own policy prior to the election, but our priority right now must be to defeat this very bad bill.’
    The Liberals were told that the only way to salvage their battered reputation would be to publicly denounce their former role in the creation of this ‘very bad bill’.
    Voters have begged the Liberal Party to abandon, in its entirety, any Parliamentary desire to curate the public conversation through various censorial laws disguised as ‘misinformation and disinformation’, ‘digital safety’, or the ‘protection of children’.
    The wider Australian community has expressed, through thousands of submissions to this bill, an overwhelming demand that the government to stop messing around in the public forum where they are not needed, invited, or wanted. Their problem is not with this specific bill, it is with the lurch within politics to obsess about public speech.
    Nobody trusts the government with censorship powers. News that the Coalition will be busy drafting Misinformation and Disinformation 2.0 once they finish voting down Labor’s bill comes as a cold chill through conservative politics.
    This refusal to give up on digital censorship sadly fits with the pattern seen in the leadership of the Opposition, where Peter Dutton frequently voices his approval for various infringements on digital liberty. Some of the worst thought bubbles in this field are his.
    No matter what their ‘good’ intentions are, the Coalition should not be seeking to replace Labor’s Misinformation and Disinformation Bill with another one of their own. Even if their next bill were ‘perfect’, it would set in law the ability to censor public speech and open the door to constant amendments which would, over time, create a tyrannical mechanism for government to misuse. Just. Stop.
    https://politicom.com.au/the-coalition-will-deliver-a-misinformation-and-disinformation-policy-prior-to-the-election/

    Reply

  6. Government Disinfo Bill a desperate cover-up for WHO dictatorship
    By LYNDESY SYMONDS 26 September, 2024
    THE government will give top priority to its Anti-Disinformation Bill because it absolutely must control the narrative. They’re going for a Ministry of Truth and a ‘Yep Yep Yep’, two-tier justice system.
    For those who have been listening to Dr. David Martin’s lectures, especially the ones he gave on September 13, 2023, in Dornach, Switzerland and the November Strasbourg lectures, and following up his research leads, it is now clear why governments are destroying mRNA vials.
    It is why court cases are simply being dismissed without verdict or disqualified on ‘no standing’ grounds – especially cases where crimes are clearly proven against government agencies and employers with regard to CoVID mandates, regulations, enforcement etc. They are dismissed, even when there is an admission from the bench that the evidence is irrefutable,
    It is why parliaments and legislative bodies refuse to even debate the issue of the excess deaths – why the members just get up and walk out or refuse to even be present for the tabling of evidence.
    Yes, all nations have been seized by the Communist Revolution and all that. Because all nations are signatory to the United Nations which (after the dissolution of the Supreme Soviet) is the presdium of the Communist Revolution – incorporating as it does every plank of the Communist Manifesto in its charter.
    But as Dr Martin would say, “Wait! There’s more”. It’s in the fine print of the treaties and charters of agencies.
    In the US we saw Operation Warp Speed and in Australia, Operation Covid Shield. These were essentially UN operations conducted in partnership with the Departments of Defence under the March 2020 official declaration of a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) by the WHO which, by the way, is still declared.
    May 2024 it was decreed that ‘the emergency phase’ of the PHEIC was no longer in operation – but that operation can be rebooted at any time.
    Under these military operations, the national laws give way to international law of the UN and its organisations. Where there is a conflict of law between the criminal law of a signatory nation like the US or Australia and the international law of the UN, the international law takes precedence. These Operations were under international law from the git-go.
    And as Dr. Martin has pointed out, the International Health Treaty which chartered the WHO in 1947 specifically indemnified and granted immunity to the WHO (and its operations) in the matter of all criminal and civil liabilities which exist in the laws of a signatory nation. Australia has signed off on this.
    So the WHO is completely indemnified to commit bio-terrorism – which Martin references in his lectures. And this raises the question, how many other of these international treaties, which charter UN agencies, contain clauses in which ratifying nations sign away their own national laws pertaining to criminal and civil liabilities. I’ll bet the WHO isn’t the only one.
    But for now the WHO and its International Health Regulations is under the spotlight. And for the enforcement of those regulations this explains why the Defence Legislation Amendment (Enhancement of Defence Force Response to Emergencies) Bill 2020 (the Bill) is to amend the Defence Act 1903 (Defence Act) and the Defence Reserve Service (Protection) Act 2001 (DRSP Act) was passed into law Dec. 8 2020.
    This Act provides indemnity for all acts which would otherwise incur criminal and civil liability for the ADF and any military forces that are tasked on Australian soil [against Australians]. This Act clearly envisions enforcement of UN operations like WHO and IHR enforcement of mandates from operations (and its multi-lateral partnerships) which have total immunity in accordance with the International Health Regulations Treaty.
    https://australianemergencylaw.com/2020/12/15/federal-parliament-passes-the-defence-legislation-amendment-enhancement-of-defence-force-response-to-emergencies-bill-2020/

    This is why David Martin ends his lectures with: Don’t reform the IHR – abolish the WHO.
    https://www.bitchute.com/video/MMXfRHgFybqK/
    MUST SHARE – David Martin – Exposing the Covid-19 Crimes – Speech in Dornach Switzerland – Part 1/2 https://www.bitchute.com/video/rpPPliimTVDF
    Source >
    https://cairnsnews.org/2024/09/26/government-disinfo-bill-a-desperate-cover-up-for-who-dictatorship/

    COME ON ALL AUSTRALIANS – STAND UP NOW FOR YOUR RIGHTS TO FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND FREEDOM OF OPINION / INFORMATION = DON’T ALLOW THEM TO STRANGLE OUR VOICES !
    Are there five more Aussie Senators who will stand for free speech?
    Libertarian MP John Ruddick addressing the crowd at Speakers’ Corner in Sydney.
    JUST 38 Senators are needed to block Anthony Albanese’s so-called Communications Legislation Amendment (Combatting Misinformation and Disinformation) Bill 2024, NSW Libertarian MP John Ruddick told a rally in Sydney last Saturday.
    “We could by Christmas living under this (censorship) regime. That means Australia will not be Australia any more, it will be called Alboralia – big government telling you what you can and cannot say. In the event it gets to that point I want to say the underground resistance will start on Day One, and I’m very lucky because I can say whatever the hell I want in the State Parliament,” said Ruddick.

    So far there are 33 Senators who will vote against the Bill, following the announcement by the Coalition that they would oppose it, leaving only five more to block it. But it is certain that Labor’s political mafia will be in the ears of the 15 Green and Independent Senators plus Jack Lambie, offering 30 pieces of silver to sell their souls by voting yes.
    The 10 Greens, of course, who have totalitarian tendencies, will be willing to leverage all sorts of deals by threatening to vote no.
    There are six independent Senators, but effectively five undecided, as the new Independent Senator Gerard Rennick will be a certainty to vote no. But the remaining 10 Greens and Jackie Lambie are prime candidates to take a Labor Party bribe in the form of some legislative amendment, grant or other political favour.
    This coming vote will be the ultimate test to see if there are Greens and Independents who care about free speech and have principles. They could suprise, but don’t hold your breath. The five “independent” Senators are David Pocock (ACT), Fatima Payman (WA), Lidia Thorpe (Vic), Tammy Tyrell (Tas.), and David Van (Vic.). Anyone wanting to contact these senators can get contact details at this site: >
    https://www.aph.gov.au/Senators_and_Members/~/~/media/972C67136DC0488CB81E78611B907282.ashx
    Source >
    https://cairnsnews.org/2024/09/29/are-there-five-more-aussie-senators-who-will-stand-for-free-speech/

    Dr Nick Coatsworth issues an urgent warning over Albanese’s government’s proposed law
    * Nick Coatsworth warns about misinformation laws * Fears the weaponsation of laws to silence debate * READ MORE: Nick Coatsworth makes major Covid admission
    Gaz’s – A Defender’s Voice
    Sep 28, 2024
    PLEASE NOTE: Coatsworth’s views below on the COVID pandemic reflect a ‘critical perspective’ on how the Australian government and health officials handled certain aspects of their response. He claims that vaccine promotion was necessary (I’d like to see the evidence for that), but he believes that vaccine mandates were a mistake, admitting in hindsight that these mandates contributed to a loss of public trust and goodwill (and let’s not forget the injured and dead). He also noted that draconian measures to control the virus were prolonged for too long, causing people to become disillusioned and resentful (well, some resented the measures from the beginning, because they were draconian!).

    The reason for Coatsworth’s inclusion in my substack is simply; because even he strongly opposes to the Combatting Misinformation and Disinformation Bill, believing it could be “weaponized” to suppress legitimate debate and dissent. He argues that the bill, aimed at curbing misinformation, could label valid public health concerns as misinformation, particularly when scientific understanding is still evolving, as seen during the COVID pandemic. He emphasizes that stifling open debate causes more harm than misinformation itself and advocates for rejecting the bill in its entirety. Instead, he supports teaching critical thinking to empower individuals to recognize falsehoods, rather than relying on legislation to control information. From Gaz’s – A Defender’s Voice
    continue >
    My comment >
    Too little, too late – but at least he’s talking a bit of truth now – Yes I remember him – he was the * mainstream media poster boy* for the jabs – and dear Dr. Nick Coatesworth got everything wrong in the entire c0vid fraud – and most definitely no mandates should have been enacted by anyone, anywhere for anything -(too bloody late for him to be saying it now – he should have been screaming it from the roof tops instead of being TV poster boy) surely Dr. Nick has seen this (hereunder) and yet claims he didn’t get the jabs wrong ?? I would scrape together some more respect for him as well as saying the mandates were wrong that the ‘jabs’ were wrong and everything else associated with the covid con – but he’s one of the ones who hopefully genuinely regrets his appalling actions as part of this covid con and the damages, despair, destruction, deaths and injuries from the jabs and the loss of jobs and the damage/destruction to so many peoples’ lives and our entire economy. Absolutely bl00dy outrageous. Still awaiting the serving of REAL HARD JUSTICE for all the perpetrators of this covid con…….. DDB
    >
    LOOK AT THE DEATHS AND INJURIES > HORRIFIC DAMAGE/DESTRUCTION/DANGEROUS AND DEADLY ‘EFFECTS’ OF THE COVID INJECTIONS/JABS/VAXXINES THAT CONTINUES, ALLEGEDLY, TO BE HIDDEN FROM THE PEOPLE !
    2. Pfizer* doc Feb 2021: READ THE COMPLETE PFIZER REPORT of deaths and vaccine injuries here particularly pages 30 – 38 >
    https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf

    Reminder > Allegedly, Pfizer and the FDA tried to suppress these deaths and injuries (which they refer to as ‘post marketing experience’ ) for 55 years I believe, and the PHMPT (Public Health Medical Professionals for Transparency) took them to Court to have the data released.

    Fortunately they apparently got a Judge who did not have any ties / financial interests / conflicts of interest and made them release the data.
    ———————————-

    MORE >
    We need to be reminded of the alleged vermin destroying our rights – thanks to Elizabeth’s magnificent works >
    SHOCKING !! – CONFLICT OF INTEREST: Australian Government officials now working for Big Pharma cartel
    Alison Bevege
    Mar 28, 2024
    Conflicts of interest in taxpayer-funded vaccination policy…so much to expose… Alison Bevege provides a useful collection of information in her Letters from Australia. Wonder if the worse than useless taxpayer-funded ABC might ever give us some critical analysis on this important issue? – Elizabeth Hart
    Meet some of the biggest fish. You want to know how we got forced to spend $18 billion on covid gene-vaccines and treatments under secret contracts?
    Government heavyweights and the drug industry are laced together by their careers. Ambition and undue influence has shut the public out of decision-making.
    Former TGA head John Skerritt on Medicines Australia board
    Professor John Skerritt, the face of Australia’s vaccine mandates and lockdowns, has been appointed to the board of Big Pharma lobby group Medicines Australia.
    Professor Skerritt was Deputy Secretary Health Products Regulation Group at the Department of Health until April 2023 and head of the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA). He will bring his top-level internal knowledge of how the TGA and Health Departments work along with his contacts straight to the big pharmaceutical corporations, who profited from the pandemic-era policies.
    Other Medicines Australia board members, with whom he will rub shoulders, are high-level executives from Merck Sharp and Dohme, Janssen, GSK, Abbvie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim and Pfizer, as Medicines Australia’s website says.
    Former Prime Minister Julia Gillard, Wellcome Trust chair
    Health Department head Jane Halton, long-term CEPI chair.
    TGA senior official Mark McDonald now at GSK
    Overseas kingpins
    How the cartel works: a new TB vaccine
    Please read full article >
    https://elizabethhart.substack.com/cp/143148180

    AND >

    Senator Roberts
    TGA AND PHARMACEUTICAL INTERESTS ARE TOO CLOSE
    https://www.malcolmrobertsqld.com.au/tga-and-pharmaceutical-interests-are-too-close/

    AND >

    And again excuse my fury against this alleged political vermin and the Big Pharma co-vermin / accomplices
    SEE >

    96 % OF AUSTRALIA’S TGA FUNDING IS FROM THE PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY since 1989 – SERIOUS CONFLICT OF INTEREST – PROFESSOR IAN BRIGHTHOPE SLAMS EXPERIMENTAL mRNA GENE THERAPY AND EXPOSES TGA (THERAPEUTIC GOODS ADMINISTRATION) CORRUPTION
    We know that the lipidnanoparticle will take the RNA and there’s also contamination from DNA into the genome of individuals.
    ***** TGA is supposed to be the Powerful, Astute, Independent, Unbiased, Uncompromised, Non-conflicted, Transparent, Honest, Ethical, Effective Watchdog of the Pharmaceutical Industry BUT IS ALMOST FULLY FUNDED BY THEM – this is allegedly the most shocking Conflict of Interest ! *****
    https://substack.com/profile/26530068-the-green-hornet/note/c-53288458

    Leftists use ‘safety’ to steal away freedom
    Posted on : 14/09/2024- by Paul Collits
    The political elites are now saying they no longer trust parents to supervise their children’s social media use. But this is merely a bonus. The real objective is control of the internet.
    This is beyond “never let a crisis go to waste”. This is “create the crisis then propose the solution”. It is the new bible of Leftist policy development.
    https://politicom.com.au/leftists-use-safety-to-steal-away-freedom/

    Reply

Please share your thoughts...